Augmenti gives teams AI agents trained in Double Diamond, IDEO HCD, and integrated business frameworks — each enforcing phase discipline through architecture, not suggestion.
Three failure modes that derail even well-intentioned teams.
Under time pressure, teams jump straight to solutions before genuinely understanding the problem. The result: elegant answers to the wrong questions.
Research done in Discover rarely survives into Develop. Teams start ideating without the evidence they gathered, repeating old assumptions.
One facilitator cannot meaningfully support six teams at once. Without visibility into where teams are stuck, interventions come too late — or not at all.
Each agent knows exactly what phase it's in — and what it's not allowed to do.
The Discover agent surfaces tensions, asks probing questions, and refuses to name solutions. It triggers empathy maps, stakeholder maps, and observation boards automatically as the conversation deepens.
The Define agent challenges vague problem statements, demands evidence for every assertion, and pushes toward a sharp, testable HMW. It won't let teams proceed with a fuzzy brief.
The Develop agent uses yes-and framing to push teams past their first ideas. It won't evaluate or rank concepts until there are at least five. Dot voting and 2×2 matrices open only when the board is full.
The Deliver agent asks "how will you test that?" at every turn. It drives teams toward concrete prototype specs, structured test scripts, and defensible validation plans.
A fifth agent runs silently at phase boundaries, compressing every artefact into a structured handoff brief. The next phase agent begins with full context — without teams having to repeat themselves.
Three distinct methodology tracks, each with AI agents configured for its specific discipline.
The canonical design thinking process — two divergent-convergent cycles moving from problem space to solution space. Each diamond has its own AI agent with hard constraints baked into its system prompt.
IDEO's three-space model — Inspiration, Ideation, Implementation — with AI agents that understand the nuance between divergent and convergent thinking within each space.
A growing library of strategy frameworks — each with a dedicated AI agent that demands evidence, challenges assumptions, and automatically passes outputs forward as structured inputs to subsequent frameworks. Facilitators choose their playbook before the session starts.
Whiteboards are great for brainstorming. They don't enforce methodology.
| Feature |
Augmenti
|
Miro | MURAL | FigJam | SessionLab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI methodology guidance | ✓ | ~ | ~ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Phase-specific AI agents | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Double Diamond scaffolding | ✓ | ~ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Business frameworks (PESTEL/SWOT/Porter's) | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cross-framework data flow | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Facilitator visibility dashboard | ✓ | ~ | ~ | ✗ | ~ |
| University / academic pricing | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ~ | ✗ |
| Facilitators billed as seats | Never | Always | Always | Always | Always |
✓ Full support · ~ Partial / template only · ✗ Not available
Augmenti sits at the front of the innovation pipeline — the ambiguous space before your execution tools take over. It doesn't replace Jira, Confluence, or Figma. It makes everything that goes into them better.
Problem: Sprint facilitators can't support six concurrent teams. Insights evaporate. Deliverables look like rebranded Wikipedia.
With Augmenti: Each team has a trained AI facilitator. Human facilitators monitor all teams in real time from a single dashboard. Every artefact carries provenance back to original research.
Problem: Students pattern-match to templates without understanding the methodology behind them. Facilitators spend most of their time giving the same feedback to every team.
With Augmenti: The AI enforces rigor so facilitators focus on nuance, not basics. Students can't skip discovery — the agent simply won't let them.
Problem: Frameworks get completed in isolation. PESTEL analysis doesn't inform the SWOT. SWOT findings don't drive the strategy. Each tool is an island.
With Augmenti: PESTEL outputs auto-populate SWOT. SWOT generates TWOS strategies. Every analysis builds on the last. Deliverables are defensible and evidence-grounded.
Pay only for the participants who use the platform. Facilitators, admins, and observers are never charged.
Pro tier · A$25/seat/mo or A$21/seat/mo billed annually
Prices shown in AUD. Non-AUD prices are approximate and billed in AUD at checkout. Annual plan = 2 months free (~17% discount). Facilitators and admins are never billed as participant seats.
We're onboarding a small group of teams in the second half of 2026. Join the waitlist and we'll reach out directly.
No spam. No credit card. Just early access.